Closing the Remediation Gap in Enterprise Security Programmes
Most security programmes produce findings. Far fewer have the infrastructure to make sure those findings actually get fixed. The result is the "report and forget" pattern — tests are conducted, reports are issued, and months later the same vulnerabilities reappear.
This case study from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, examines why remediation stalls, what it costs when findings sit unresolved, and what a closed-loop workflow looks like in practice.
What you will learn:
- Why unresolved findings create compounding risk across multi-asset programmes
- The operational shift from PDF-based reporting to platform-enabled remediation tracking
- How leading teams achieve a 30% average improvement in MTTR and MTTF
- What the five-step closed-loop remediation workflow looks like: Discover → Assign → Track → Retest → Close
Get the full case study to see how to operationalise remediation across your security programme.










