SlashdotMedia AdOps Asset Management

Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Benchmark Report

Vendor ecosystems are expanding faster than most third-party risk programs can keep up with. Manual questionnaires and spreadsheets fragment ownership, evidence, and audit defensibility right when assurance expectations are rising.

Hyperproof surveyed security, risk, and compliance leaders to see how real programs assess vendor risk, budget for it, and handle the newest wrinkle: AI in the vendor stack.

In this report, you will learn:

Why 73 percent of automated programs use a dedicated VRM solution, versus 49 percent of manual ones
Why 34 percent of respondents still manage third-party risk in spreadsheets
How organizations are formalizing (or not yet formalizing) AI supplier risk assessment
Maturity and spend benchmarks segmented by budget, region, and industry

Download the report and see exactly where your TPRM program stands against your peers.

How to Prioritize Implementing New Compliance Frameworks

As your company grows, so does the list of regulations you're expected to meet. Choosing the wrong framework to prioritize wastes budget and slows down deals with new customers, markets, and investors.

This guide gives risk and compliance leaders a structured way to decide what to implement next, based on company stage, customer type, industry, and the data you handle.

In this guide, you'll learn:

The 7 dimensions of risk and compliance every growing company should evaluate
Which frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, CMMC) map to your stage and customers
How data type, from health records to financial data, drives your regulatory obligations
A practical way to balance risk exposure against your growth timeline

Download the guide to build a compliance roadmap that supports expansion, not slows it down.

The Pentest Tax: The Hidden Cost Draining Your Security Team

Enterprise security teams are spending more time managing their penetration testing programmes than running them. Scheduling, scoping, chasing stakeholders, tracking findings in spreadsheets, and manually assembling audit evidence — the admin overhead is enormous, and most of it is invisible.

This report from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, quantifies the real cost of running a security testing programme without dedicated tooling — and shows what the shift to a platform-driven model looks like in practice.

What you will learn:

How ~20 days of admin overhead per engagement breaks down across scoping, scheduling and coordination
Why 76% of organisations testing multiple asset types face compounding complexity
The four characteristics of streamlined security operations that cut human effort by 30-50%
A practical checklist for programme structure, remediation tracking, compliance readiness and tooling

Closing the Remediation Gap by at least 30% in Enterprise Security Programmes

Most security programmes produce findings. Far fewer have the infrastructure to make sure those findings actually get fixed. The result is the "report and forget" pattern — tests are conducted, reports are issued, and months later the same vulnerabilities reappear.

This success story from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, examines why remediation stalls, what it costs when findings sit unresolved, and what a closed-loop workflow looks like in practice.

What you will learn:

Why unresolved findings create compounding risk across multi-asset programmes
The operational shift from PDF-based reporting to platform-enabled remediation tracking
How leading teams achieve a 30% average improvement in MTTR and MTTF
What the five-step closed-loop remediation workflow looks like: Discover → Assign → Track → Retest → Close

Get the full success story to see how to operationalise remediation across your security programme.

How Regulated Organisations Are Eliminating Compliance Overhead

Security teams operating under PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 or Cyber Essentials Plus know the real challenge is not running penetration tests - it is proving they happened, documenting what was found, and showing remediation within a defined window. Most teams rebuild this evidence from scratch before every audit.

This case study from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, breaks down the compliance patterns that create the most overhead and shows what a continuously audit-ready programme looks like.

What you will learn:

Why evidence fragmentation is the top compliance time drain
Four failure modes that affect regulated organisations most
How platform-enabled testing programmes reduce manual effort by 30-50%
What practical, always-ready compliance looks like across fintech, healthtech and SaaS

Get the full case study to see a better model for compliance-ready security testing.

How Highmark Federal Credit Union Automates 40+ File Transfers And Detects Fraud With MOVEit

Highmark Federal Credit Union started as a teacher's credit union in a broom closet under a stairwell. Today, it serves members across five locations in two states and depends on MOVEit Automation to keep critical file workflows running around the clock.

What you'll learn:

How Highmark automated 30 to 40 recurring tasks including ACH payroll processing, eStatement delivery, and daily banking notices
How they built a custom fraud detection program that uses MOVEit to flag suspicious transactions and generate daily call lists for their team
Why their strategy treats automation as a force multiplier for staff, not a replacement, freeing programmers and analysts to focus on projects that move the business forward
How MOVEit has delivered three years of uptime with zero outages across their Progress tech stack including WS_FTP Pro and ShareFile

AI Is Live In Production. Is Your Identity Stack Ready?

AI agents, copilots, and AI-powered features are already touching customer data and internal systems. Yet 88% of leaders say their identity and security infrastructure is behind, and the most confident teams report the most incidents.

The 2026 State of AI and Identity Report draws on responses from more than 300 technology and security leaders to show where that gap turns into real risk, and what the teams who contain it do differently.

In this report, you will learn:

Why identity risk spikes when AI moves from pilot to pervasive use
How the confidence-reality gap leaves mature-looking organizations exposed
Why comprehensive policies and processes are not enough on their own
How leading teams rethink deployment, isolation, and machine identity
The 9 architecture questions to ask any identity vendor

Why IT Teams Are Tossing Out TeamViewer And Switching To Platform-Native Remote Support

TeamViewer creates an intelligence black hole. Every remote support session happens in a separate system your platform AI can't see, and with only 33% enterprise adoption, two-thirds of your support data never reaches your AI at all.

This guide breaks down the real cost of consumer-built remote support and what changes when you go platform-native:

The AI Acceleration Loop: how platform-native support creates compounding intelligence that consumer tools can't match
Four break points where TeamViewer kills your AI learning pipeline
Security vulnerabilities from consumer-first architecture, including the June 2024 corporate IT breach
Compliance gaps that leave your audit team without answers on data residency, consent logging, and session documentation
Real-world results from ServiceNow, Salesforce, OpenTable, and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan

Break Up With BeyondTrust. Unlock Your Platform AI.

BeyondTrust's appliance-based architecture traps troubleshooting intelligence outside your ITSM platform. Your AI can't learn from what it can't see, and your platform investment delivers a fraction of its potential.

This guide breaks down the real cost of bolt-on remote support and what changes when you go platform-native:

The AI plateau: why Now Assist and Agentforce stop improving when session data stays siloed
Security architecture risks exposed by BeyondTrust's December 2024 breach (17 customers compromised)
Workflow fragmentation that drives up to 40% productivity loss from constant context switching
Infrastructure overhead that turns your IT team into appliance managers instead of platform strategists
Real-world results from ServiceNow, Salesforce, OpenTable, and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan

Why Leading IT Teams Are Moving Remote Support Inside ServiceNow

Separate remote support tools create a documentation gap that limits agent productivity and starves your AI of the data it needs. Every context switch is lost knowledge.

ScreenMeet is the ServiceNow-native remote support platform that eliminates that gap entirely. Sessions launch from incidents, run within ServiceNow workflows, and automatically capture comprehensive documentation through AI, all without agents lifting a finger.

Self-funding through productivity gains with typical payback in 6-12 months.

How Enterprise IT Teams Resolve Issues on Any Device Without Waiting for a User

ScreenMeet Beam gives your IT team secure, always-on access to endpoints and headless devices - all from inside ServiceNow. No end-user interaction. No scheduling delays. Just fast, reliable resolution with a full audit trail.

This one-pager breaks down how Beam works and why leading IT organizations trust it for unattended support at scale.

Teams can stand up ScreenMeet Beam and see value in weeks, not quarters. Join 25,000+ agents already using ScreenMeet today.

See exactly how it works in the full one-pager.

How The Governed Workspace Eliminates Browser Chaos

Your employees toggle between 1,200+ apps a day, losing hours to disconnected systems and constant context switching. The browser was the problem all along.

HERE Enterprise Browser brings applications, AI and workflows into one governed environment - purpose-built for enterprise complexity, not retrofitted from consumer technology.

In this overview, you'll discover:

How Supertabs arrange applications side by side for specific roles and tasks, eliminating context switching entirely
Why any approved AI model can be embedded directly in the workflow with built-in data loss protection
How SuperSearch reaches every enterprise system from one interface, even behind authentication barriers
Why governance, AI permissions and full audit trails are built in from day one

The Pentest Tax: The Hidden Cost Draining Your Security Team

Enterprise security teams are spending more time managing their penetration testing programmes than running them. Scheduling, scoping, chasing stakeholders, tracking findings in spreadsheets, and manually assembling audit evidence — the admin overhead is enormous, and most of it is invisible.

This report from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, quantifies the real cost of running a security testing programme without dedicated tooling — and shows what the shift to a platform-driven model looks like in practice.

What you will learn:

How ~20 days of admin overhead per engagement breaks down across scoping, scheduling and coordination
Why 76% of organisations testing multiple asset types face compounding complexity
The four characteristics of streamlined security operations that cut human effort by 30-50%
A practical checklist for programme structure, remediation tracking, compliance readiness and tooling

Closing the Remediation Gap by at least 30% in Enterprise Security Programmes

Most security programmes produce findings. Far fewer have the infrastructure to make sure those findings actually get fixed. The result is the "report and forget" pattern — tests are conducted, reports are issued, and months later the same vulnerabilities reappear.

This success story from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, examines why remediation stalls, what it costs when findings sit unresolved, and what a closed-loop workflow looks like in practice.

What you will learn:

Why unresolved findings create compounding risk across multi-asset programmes
The operational shift from PDF-based reporting to platform-enabled remediation tracking
How leading teams achieve a 30% average improvement in MTTR and MTTF
What the five-step closed-loop remediation workflow looks like: Discover → Assign → Track → Retest → Close

Get the full success story to see how to operationalise remediation across your security programme.

How Regulated Organisations Are Eliminating Compliance Overhead

Security teams operating under PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 or Cyber Essentials Plus know the real challenge is not running penetration tests - it is proving they happened, documenting what was found, and showing remediation within a defined window. Most teams rebuild this evidence from scratch before every audit.

This case study from OnSecurity, based on analysis of 14,000+ security engagements across 500+ organisations, breaks down the compliance patterns that create the most overhead and shows what a continuously audit-ready programme looks like.

What you will learn:

Why evidence fragmentation is the top compliance time drain
Four failure modes that affect regulated organisations most
How platform-enabled testing programmes reduce manual effort by 30-50%
What practical, always-ready compliance looks like across fintech, healthtech and SaaS

Get the full case study to see a better model for compliance-ready security testing.